Tuesday, September 4, 2007

Far From The Mekong

This is the second of two writing samples that I recently completed for an application I submitted.

Far From the Mekong: Seeking Agent Orange Compensation in Canada.

By Nick Logan

Canadian Forces Base (CFB) Gagetown, in my home province of New Brunswick, may be on the opposite side of the world from Viet Nam yet these two places have a dreadful connection. No Canadian soldiers set foot on Vietnamese soil during the American-led war, but the government was active “diplomatically,” providing aid and arms to the South. Canada, itself, became famous for being a safe-haven for “draft dodgers” fleeing the United States from military conscription. Today Gagetown and Vietnam are linked by the legacy of the devastating herbicides that were sprayed over their land.

During 1966 and 1967, the U.S. government was invited to test the dioxin-containing defoliant Agent Orange, at CFB Gagetown, for a combined period of 7 days. The more lethal Agent Purple and Agent White, which does not contain dioxin, but the hazardous compound hexachloribenzene, were also released over the densely forested base. The Canadian Department of National Defense (DND) has acknowledged this testing, but did not make it publicly known that the base conducted routine clearing with these chemicals over a period of 28 years. Originally, it was claimed that only 589 litres of the herbicides were sprayed during that 7 day period, but the shocking truth became known, through declassified documents, that over 1.3 million litres of the three agents – and compounds of similar makeup -- were sprayed over this expanse of time, not to mention a further one million kilograms of dry Agent White.

As with the victims of the Viet Nam war, there is a battle for compensation being fought here, in Eastern Canada. Military personnel were not placed in the direct lines of the spraying, but many were posted on the periphery: more were involved with the preparation, transport, and application of the agents. Numerous people have come forward with diseases and conditions that have been attributed to Agent Orange exposure, such as: diabetes, chloracne, Hodgkin’s disease, and various cancers. The government has recognized these findings and agreed to a paltry settlement to a small number of claimants. This deal has yet to be finalized and will prevent further prosecution should more evidence be accepted. The admission of accountability stops there.

Local teenagers were hired, part-time, to remove the waste left behind, yet they are ineligible for benefits as they were not present during the actual operations. It has been said that the debris posed no threat. Equally troubling, is that the Gagetown and Area Fact Finding Project – which is not independent of the government -- alleges that there was no possibility of neighbouring communities being affected as a result of: the poisons drifting in the air, seeping into the soil or running off into the waterways. This is an effort to hinder compensation claims for secondary exposure. Those findings are questionable, though. Their investigation only considered the land sprayed during the seven days of American testing, not the total 181,000 acres used over 3 decades and the bordering residential areas.

We may not have seen the devastating effects to the same extent that Viet Nam has, but that is no excuse for the Canadian government to attempt to minimize the severity of the issue and to avoid paying reparations. Approximately $1.7 million (CAD) has been spent trying to debunk the claims, but public outcry is growing. Two thousand people are involved in the class-action lawsuit, seeking at least $50,000 each. The government’s complacency is not averting a payout, simply delaying it.

3 comments:

Kentar1948 said...

Gagetown

I guess this is just more misspoken Ottawa misinformation' to mislead
the general public about Gagetown. This document or rundown on the
1966 US Defoliant spray testing done at CFB Gagetown which was;
prepared by Major W.O. Taylor, CLO, although not very damaging in
itself, never the less leaves many questions to be answered.

Taken From said document:

2. Use diesel oil only as a diluent rather than 80/20 water/diesel
oil, and reduce mixed volume applied from five gallons per acre to
one or two gallons per acre. The diesel oil as diluent should give a
better effect where rainy weather can be anticipated soon after
application. End.

It must be noted that this seems to indicate that Canada was using an
80/20 water/diesel oil mixture in it's spray program. Or at least 20%
of what was sprayed in Gagetown was actually diesel oil.

In my opinion, it seems a bit more then strange to spray diesel fuel
over the forested areas to prevent forest fires, which is one of the
most persistent stories we are told when we ask why the spraying was
done in the first place.

The second thing I noted was that the US was actually recommending
that we cut back on the amounts which Canada was using (spraying in
CFB Gagetown) from 5 gallons to one or two gallons per acre,
indicating that we (the Canadian military) were using as much as 500%
the required amounts for brush control. And in my opinion, as much as
500% per acre more then the US military chemical experts were using
in Vietnam.

No matter if you agree with my personal opinion or not, or if you
come to the same conclusions as I did, it nevertheless opens up room
for doubt as to many of the responses we have been receiving from
Ottawa. And leaves many unanswered questions which only a full Public
Inquiry could get to the bottom of.

**********************

Another little tidbit found in yet another government document:
#A0098385 shown below; Taken From said document:

Agriculture Canada only ever registered one product containing 2,4-D
and 2,4,5-T for aerial application - and it was a 1:1 mixture (50/50
would assume only concentrated active ingredients were present - the
active ingredients in the Canadian registered product were diluted).
PCP#7885 was registered for use from 1961 to 1967. The files on 2,4-D
and 2,4,5-T from the period in question have been retrieved.

End.

This document was prepared by Jason Flint Head, Office of Policy and
Strategic Advice, Pest Management Regulatory Agency, in response to
questions from Berthiaume.HTforces.gc.ca and was in reply to an email
received from Herbicide Usage (Health Canada/PMRA).

Ottawa has steadfastly claimed, that except for the 7 days of US
Military chemical testing done in '66 and '67, to have only used
registered chemicals in it's defoliation program in CFB Gagetown. Yet
according to DND's own document titled "Overview of Herbicide Spray
Program 1956 - 1984," it clearly indicates that a 50/50 mix of 2,4-D
and 2,4,5-T were used in 1956 and 1957, well before any such product
was in fact registered for aerial application in Canada. And worse
yet that the chemical 2,4,5-T (the Dioxin culprit) was sprayed by
itself or at least 200% higher Dioxin levels then Agent Orange ever
contained, in 1960 and '61, as well as having been mixed with Ammate
in 1958.

This document also indicates that the registered product was in fact
diluted when there is absolutely no indication that what was used in
Gagetown was. Again, questions arise that could only possibly be
answered by a full Public Inquiry.

**************************

Ottawa continues to steadfastly claim that they never sprayed Agents
Orange, White, and Purple, and in fact (except for the US '66-'67
tests) had never used any of the Rainbow herbicides here in Canada.
Facts are that this is technically true. Canada only used a 50/50 mix
of 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T and later Tordon 101 and/or 10K, which the US
military, later in history (in Vietnam) for quick identification
purposes nicknamed Agents Orange, White, Purple and a bunch of other
colors. And these were identified by the colored stripes painted on
the barrels containing the defoliant chemicals.

The question is, whether a 50/50 mix of 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T is in fact
Agent Orange, and if Tordon 101 is Agent White. Technically, no, but
the chemical called Agent Orange is a 50/50 mix of 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T
and Agent White is Tordon 101 or Tordon 10K.

Ottawa has been playing with words and semantics for over 50 years as
Canada's loving Veterans and their descendants have died, and still
continue to die, from the CFB Gagetown chemical defoliant testing
mistakes.

The truth is that Dioxin and HCB are the chemicals which are killing
the victims and it matters little if it came from a drum which had a
painted orange or white stripe around it or not.

Only a full Public and Judicial Inquiry will answer the so many
questions that at this time remain unanswered.

POSTED BY: Cpl. Kenneth H. Young CD (Ret'd)., Nanaimo, BC

Nancy Belfry said...

The Prime Minister of Canada, Stephen Harper lied to Canadians poisoned at CFB Gagetown.

Mr. Harper promised full and fair compensation to ALL those who's health has been affected by the spraying of defoliants on CFB Gagetown from 1956 until 1984 in the last Federal election.

Veterans Affairs Minister Greg Thompson (when not in power)himself called for a PUBLIC INQUIRY into the spraying of defoliants on CFB Gagetown from 1956 until 1984.

Promised - Medical testing to ANYONE that believed their health has been affected by the spraying of Gagetown.

Broken promises.

No PUBLIC INQUIRY.
A DND Fact Finders mission, they investigated themselves.

No compensation for thousands made sick by the herbicides.
I have the same illness as a British soldier who was sent to CFB Gagetown the summer of 1966, his Government has given him a disability pension for his exposure to defoliants sprayed that summer.
My Government (Canadian) does not offer anything.

Widows will not receive compensation for the death (caused by the herbicides sprayed) of a spouse.
Parents that have lost children due to their exposure as children to these herbicides will receive nothing.

No medical testing has been offered.

Anonymous said...

I am doing research for my college thesis, thanks for your brilliant points, now I am acting on a sudden impulse.

- Laura

around the world where nick has been